Op Ed
Gas crisis pales before Twomey smokescreen (page 20)
by Paul Murray
“Education Minister Mark McGowan can thank his luck stars that WA is gripped by a gas crisis. Were the consequences of the Varanus Island explosion not grabbing so much media attention, Mr McGowan's performance over the release of the Twomey report into WA's education staffing crisis - and its effect on the long-running teachers' pay dispute - would be getting much heavier scrutiny.
“And the deeper you look into Mr McGowan's actions since he received the report last December from former Curtin University vice-chancellor Professor Lance Twomey, the worse it looks for him.
“After reading the report, my first conclusion was that Mr McGowan must have failed comprehension in primary school.
“How could he not understand the compelling argument Professor Twomey was putting to him for urgent action on a wide range of issues, not the least teachers' pay levels?
“Perhaps Mr McGowan missed out on those remedial reading classes they offer in the navy for sailors which poor literacy skills.
“There must be a good reason why he failed to understand that professor Twomey's findings on the task force's No.1 issues, remuneration, would never support the Minister's tactics against the teachers' pay claims.
“Surely it couldn't be that the Minister for Education was seeking to deceive the State's teachers when he failed to comprehend Professor Twomey's call for an "immediate and significant" increase to their pay.
“Hiding the report for seven months while using every available tactic to frustrate the teachers' legitimate pay demands does not seem compatible with the word "immediate".
“Mr McGowan now appears to have damaged himself irreparably with teachers. Certainly, the teachers' union has reason to question why it should be a union affiliated with the Labor Party when a Minister treats it in such a fashion.
“The Minister has the gall to say that he released the report "in good faith". Nothing could be further from the truth. What the report exposes starkly is the extent of the bad faith in his dealings with the teachers.
“An Education Minister dealing in good faith - and with a sensible political head on his shoulders - would have realised on first reading of the Twomey report that he needed to have the teachers and their union on side for the huge job it outlines.
“Unless he had the ability to keep the report under wraps for all time - and he didn't - a practical Minister would have realised its potential to expose his Government's protracted failings in dealing with the teacher shortage.
“But because he knew the report favoured the union's pay campaign, Mr McGowan sat on it, citing the need for Cabinet to respond first to its wider implications.
“It is completely disingenuous to argue that an important Government report could not be made public before Cabinet deals with its recommendations. It happens all the time.
“The illogicality of the Minister's argument was made obvious by his decision to release it last week still without any public response by him or anyone else in Cabinet.
It appears the report was released because the Minister feared he would be forced to produce it in the protracted pay dispute in the Industrial Relations Commission.
“Just last month when questioned about the report by shadow education minister John Day in the Legislative Assembly, Mr McGowan indicated it would not be released until much later in the year:
Mr McGowan: "It has been on the agenda of a Cabinet committee."
Mr Day: "Which Cabinet committee?"
Mr McGowan: "I cannot remember, but it was one of the Cabinet committees. It is a Cabinet document. The member need not worry - once we have a response, it will be released. The instant I release it without a response, the member will be the first to ask, 'Where's your response?'"
Mr Day: "It is now six months later and the Minister still does not have a response. Surely he can at least let people know what is in the report so we can all be involved? That is often the case with reports. The Government can then go away and present a response within three months. Why can the Minister not do that?"
Mr McGowan: "Once the Government has developed a response, we will release it. If I were to release it without a response, the member would call on me to release a response."
Mr Day: “How long does the Minister need to prepare a response?”
Mr McGowan: "How long is a piece of string? As I said to the member, other levels of government and other portfolios are involved. Once we have all the necessary information, we will present a response."
Mr Day: "It is six months after the report was presented to the Minster and we still do not have any outcome. It is quite amazing."
“Even more amazing is that the Minister has now released the report without any response, having hidden it from the teachers' union and the public for seven months. Several things are now very clear.
“Mr McGowan denied the public the full knowledge of the Twomey report as part of a dumb political game he could only ever lose.
“Instead of co-opting teachers to help in the multi-headed approach recommended by Professor Twomey, Mr McGowan has further alienated them.
“Seven months down the track, the public has still not been shown that the Government is capable of fixing the massive problems the report outlines.
“And we think the gas crisis is a disaster.”
From The West Australian
Editorial
No winner in senseless education war (page 20)
“The increasingly virulent war between the Carpenter Government and the teachers' union will produce no winner. The losers are students and parents who have to contend with continuing uncertainty about and destabilisation of school activities as a result of bans or threats of them.
“Teachers may or may not end up with a bigger pay rise than they have been offered by the Government. But any increase on that is likely to be marginal and more than offset by damage to the public standing of the teaching profession which the union professes to uphold.
“Education Minister Mark McGowan has already lost he war; regardless of the official result. His recourse to legalism is a tacit admission of his failure to sell the offer to teachers or to get Cabinet to endorse a better deal for them.
“He has mishandled this from the start. It is almost beyond comprehension that he would commission a report on the teachers shortage and what should be done to overcome it, withhold it for six months on the pretext of Cabinet confidentiality and then suddenly release it with nothing by way of adequate explanation or response as the pay dispute goes to arbitration.
“All the arguments about the need for secrecy while the Government prepared a response evaporated in a relative instant. Presumably, the embarrassing realisation dawned belatedly on Mr McGowan or others in the Government that the report could be called as evidence for the arbitration which, ironically, his side of the argument sought. If he did not foresee from the start the significance of such a report to the pay negotiations, he was either arrogant beyond caring or politically inept - or some combination of both. [emphasis added]
“In the current mess of open hostilities, both sides show signs of having lost sight of their obligations to public education. The union appears bent on using whatever opportunity it can find for imposing bans on this or that and Mr McGowan has taken it to the WA Industrial Relations Commission for the fifth time this year - this time to overturn its attempt to obstruct the introduction of all new Year 11 courses next year. The union may have a point on those courses, but surely it could make its case without resorting to bans.
“It's time for both sides to understand that the public doesn't care which of them scores more points off the other. People accept that teachers should be paid fairly, but not that they should penalise students in pursuit of their pay claims. Mr McGowan should not need to be told that he is entrusted and paid by the public to run a decent education system, not to be preoccupied with waging war on teachers.”
From The West Australian
‘Time running out’ for Year 11 courses (page 7)
by Kate Campbell
“WA’s industrial umpire could waste its time ruling on the State Government’s bid to stop the teachers’ union banning new Year 11 courses next year, with the union leader saying time might run out to implement the fresh curriculum in 2009 even if it was legally ordered to lift the boycott.
“Education Minister Mark McGowan has ordered his department to take the State School Teachers Union to the WA Industrial Relations Commission for the fifth time this year after the union vowed to ban the implementation of more than 30 new Year 11 courses planned for all WA schools next year.
“The union says it has no alternative but to veto the 2009 courses because teachers cannot cope with the extra workload stress in preparing the subjects and blames the Government for failing to resource the roll-out properly.
“Union president Anne Gisborne predicted it “could take some considerable time” before the latest stand-off was resolved. It could be too late to get some courses up and running by next year even if the IRC forced the ban to be overturned. This dispute would probably take the most time for the IRC to deal with of any union matter referred to it this year.
“Mr McGowan also called on Ms Gisborne to stand down from the Curriculum Council over this issue, which she has refused to do.
“Shadow education minister Peter Collier said if the courses were not finalised by midway through term 3, about two months away, it would be too late to aim for next year.
“His (Mr McGowan’s) petulance is only serving to inflame what’s and already volatile situation,” he said.
“Marko Vojkovic, spokesman for teachers’ group People Lobbying Against Teaching Outcomes, said no IRC order, fast or slow, would change this week’s decision to halt the course roll-out.
“(The course ban) is not industrial action,” he said. “They would have a very hard time proving we are harming the kids by delaying the courses of study when they’ve already been delayed I think three times in the past.” [emphasis added]
From The West Australian
Parents of pre-schoolers with autism to get up to $6000 aid (page 54)
by Andrew Tillett, Canberra
“Parents of pre-school-aged children with autism will receive up to $6000 a year for two years to pay for early intervention programs.
“The Federal Government yesterday rolled out the first program of a $190 million package to help families get access to behavioural therapies, psychologists, doctors and one-on-one and group programs for pre-school children.
“Under the program announced yesterday, about 9000 children diagnosed with autism will be eligible for assistance. Families in rural and remote areas will be eligible for a further $2000 to help meet their higher costs of care.
“Other elements include Government funding for 150 playgroups for autistic children, paying for special training for 450 teachers and school staff to support autistic students and hiring 40 advisers to help parents following diagnosis.
“Autism Association of West Australia chief executive Joan McKenna Kerr said parents would welcome the package.
“First and foremost we have a whole host of initiatives that are going to provide a safety net at a time of grave crisis for a family when they realise their child is not developing as he or she should be,” Ms McKenna Kerr said.”
From The West Australian