PLATO

The Education Watchdog


Breaking News: Week of 23 October 2006

Monday 23 October 2006

Tuesday 24 October

Wednesday 25 October

Thursday 26 October

Friday 27 October

Saturday – Sunday, 28 – 29 October

 

Monday 23 October


Response to Kevin Donnelly’s geography editorial in The Australian

Once again, Kevin Donnelly has misled readers of The Australian newspaper with his biased column (28/9/06). In particular, his reference to Western Australia’s consultation draft exam is inaccurate.

The source for the stimulus material in the draft exam is a report by the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), 1987. The report is a reputable, internationally recognised body presenting expert opinions. Contrary to Donnelly’s position, a doomsday scenario is not presented. The WCED lists broad barriers to economic development, including the reliance on fossil fuels, the growth in the human population beyond the capacity of natural systems, and the lack of a strong framework for economic decision-making that considers environmental issues. The WCED does not attribute environmental problems to large companies, however it does indicate that one consequence of our heavy reliance on fossil fuels is problems of economic development resulting from the powerful position of these multinational corporations.

Donnelly’s linking of the new Geography course with an “Age of Aquarius” attempts to dismiss part of the core shared values that underlie the Western Australian Curriculum Framework. He fails to acknowledge that this is a small extract from the course rationale. He ignores the references to geographical skills, knowledge and understanding that are also central to the course.

Donnelly states that the WA course ignores the work of environmental sceptics such as Bjorn Lomborg. The course does not promote any particular viewpoints, but requires students to critically examine different points of view. Lomborg’s most well-known book, The Skeptical Environmentalist, was in fact found by the Danish Committees on Scientific Dishonesty in 2003 to “Objectively . . . fall within the concept of scientific dishonesty . . . in view of the subjective requirements made in terms of intent or gross negligence, [it] cannot fall within the bounds of this characterization. Conversely, the publication is deemed clearly contrary to the standards of good scientific practice”. This is exactly why Geography students are encouraged to rigorously examine arguments around an issue.

In WA’s new Geography course, students learn about ‘social, political and economic factors that impact on decisions about sustainability’ as part of the essential course content. This includes ‘economic factors such as the need for employment, increasing world demand for natural resources and the desire to increase standards of living.’ It is unlikely that any student will remain unaware of the importance of Australia’s primary industries after completing this course.

 

Tuesday 24 October

Wednesday 25 October

Thursday 26 October

Friday 27 October


Saturday – Sunday, 28 – 29 October


This page last updated 14 August, 2008 1:42 AM